On Prorogation

Published: 24 September 2019

Dan Wincott of Cardiff University responds to the ruling of the Supreme Court.

Extraordinary. The UK Supreme Court has come to a unanimous decision. A clear, simple series of decisions on justiciability (whether there was a legal question on which the Court could decide), the unlawfulness of the advice given to the  Queen and also of the prorogation Order-in-Council and that the Westminster Parliament has not been prorogued. It has done so with the largest possible number of Justices sitting.  Critically, all legislation passing through Westminster falls when that Parliament is prorogued.  The fact that we now know Westminster was never prorogued means all that legislation - much of it needed for Brexit - active and can still be passed into law. It is worth noting that Lady Hale emphasised the scope and consequences of the prorogation and thus did not need to delve into its exercise or the motives behind it.  For example, the Court did not have to take a position on whether or not the Prime Minister had ‘lied to the Queen’.  To make sense of the full significance of this remarkable judgement we will need to read it the full when it is published.

Continuity and consolidation?

Northern Ireland will never be the same again

The 'other Union': Indyref2 and the future of the UK

Will 2019 be like 1987, 2015 or 2017?

The English Question and Brexit

Is the Scottish party system in flux? @MalcH argues that #GeneralElectionResults2019 is the new norm. But there are… https://t.co/6T8JHE2l4W

8 hours ago

What does the #GeneralElection2019 result mean for #ScottishIndependence? CCC Fellow @Coree_Brown shares her though… https://t.co/G5M3qGc5hI

8 hours ago

"The results of the 2019 general election are a radical departure for Northern Ireland, and mark a fundamental tran… https://t.co/aVq9UXFH5k

10 hours ago

RT @mark_mclaughlin: "There is not going to be an independence referendum in 2021. "It takes a long time to set up a referendum..this is g…

11 hours ago