Why women have become politicised in great numbers

This article originally appeared in The Herald

Although, overall, women were slightly less likely to vote Yes than men in the independence referendum, the upswing in voter turnout and in support for the Yes campaign was due in no small part to grassroots women’s organisations campaigning for independence.

They did so on the basis of two expectations. The first was that the need to design a new constitutional framework for an independent nation offered the opportunity to embed gender equality into the values that underpinned it. Several working groups involving different parts of civic society were also enthusiastic about this: the international evidence shows that countries that do this are more likely to develop policies that lead to gender equality, and are more likely to protect services designed to support gender equality.

The second was on the basis of specific policy promises aimed at fostering and supporting gender equality, such as the much publicised intention to scrap Trident and use the savings to pay for childcare, the latter a policy that was scrutinised for its impact on gender equality at a conference in Glasgow last week.

Scrapping Trident tapped into historic support for "Bairns, Not Bombs", and meant that many on the Left and anti-nuclear groups, such as the Scottish Socialist Party and the Greens, supported such policies because they were anti-nuclear and pro-women’s rights.

In 1995 a similar phenomenon happened in the Quebec independence referendum. The women’s movement there helped to turn a historically fairly constant low level of support for independence into a 49 per cent vote in favour of Yes, even closer than in the Scottish referendum. They did so for similar reasons: a desire to see gender equality embedded into the constitution of a new way that would support Quebecois values and aspirations, and the promise of specific policy pledges around women’s equality such as universal childcare. Even though the vote was No, the women’s movement in Quebec used the political momentum of the referendum to campaign successfully for universal childcare policies that were significantly different to the rest of Canada.

In Scotland, a broad grassroots movement of women who supported independence coalesced into the organisation Women for Independence, including well-known Scottish feminists such as Lesley Riddoch, Jeanne Freeman and Carolyn Leckie, but also appealing to a swathe of women with no historical links to the women’s movement or pro-independence parties. Nicola Sturgeon worked directly with such organisations, and her style of politics appealed to men and women who were disengaged by the combative nature of the public debate.

The final straw for politically engaged and feminist women was probably the misguided "Better Ask Paul" campaign from the Better Together team. Based on conversations the director had shared with "normal" women whilst campaigning, the advert depicted a woman who could not make up her mind how to vote, and so deferred to her husband’s view that the Yes vote would be too risky. This was the death knell for any hope the Better Together campaign might appeal to the women’s movement. Its release coincided with an upsurge in the polls in support for a Yes vote.

Women historically tend to be more likely than men to make a rational assessment of the choices rather than vote along party lines. It is for this reason that in many elections women are key "swing voters", more likely to change parties on the basis of policies. So it is perhaps not surprising that this upswing did not quite turn into enough votes to secure independence for Scotland: the risks of independence, particularly around currency, public services and the economy meant that cautious hearts prevailed and Scotland voted No.

But women’s voices did not go away. Alex Salmond’s failure to deliver independence opened up the opportunity for Nicola Sturgeon, always more of a feminist, to serve as First Minister with the first 50/50 gender split cabinet in the UK’s history. Organisations such as Women for Independence continue to grow in membership. Many of the first-time SNP MPs voted into Westminster in the historic 2015 general election are pro women’s equality, including the country’s youngest MP Mhairi Black. Childcare has remained on the political agenda. The leaders or co-convenors of four of the five parties in the Scottish Parliament are women. Women have clearly become politicised in great numbers and gender equality matters more than ever in Scottish politics and policy.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Kirstein Rummery's picture
University of Stirling
20th October 2015
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 22nd January 2019

    The UK is increasingly polarised by Brexit identities and they seem to have become stronger than party identities, a new academic report finds. Only one in 16 people did not have a Brexit identity, while more than one in five said they had no party identity. Sir John Curtice’s latest analysis of public opinion on a further referendum finds there has been no decisive shift in favour of another referendum. The report, Brexit and public opinion 2019, by The UK in a Changing Europe, provides an authoritative, comprehensive and up-to-date guide to public opinion on each of the key issues around Brexit. CCC Fellow, Dr Coree Brown Swan contributed a chapter on "the SNP, Brexit and the politics of independence"

  • 22nd January 2019

    In the papers accompanying the draft Environment (Principles and Governance) Bill published at the end of 2018, the UK Government says that it is “exploring opportunities to co-design the final proposals with the devolved administrations.” There are clear benefits in having strong co-operation and collaboration across the UK in the oversight of our environmental law and performance. Yet the challenge of finding a way forward in terms of working together is substantial since each part of the UK is in a different position at present. Given where things stand today, it may be better to accept that a good resolution is not possible immediately and to revisit the issue at a later stage - so long as there is a strong commitment to return and not allow interim arrangements to become fixed. Colin Reid, Professor of Environmental Law at the University of Dundee examines the issues.

  • 17th January 2019

    Richard Parry assesses a memorable day in UK parliamentary history as the Commons splits 432-202 on 15 January 2019 against the Government's recommended Brexit route. It was the most dramatic night at Westminster since the Labour government’s defeat on a confidence motion in 1979.

  • 17th January 2019

    What is the Irish government’s Brexit wish-list? The suggestion that Irish unity, as opposed to safeguarding political and economic stability, is the foremost concern of the Irish government is to misunderstand and misrepresent the motivations of this key Brexit stakeholder, writes Mary C. Murphy (University College Cork).

  • 17th January 2019

    Brexit is in trouble but not because of the Irish backstop, argues the CCC's Michael Keating.

Read More Posts