What role for the devolved nations in Brexit?

On 24 October the plenary Joint Ministerial Committee [JMC (P)] of UK, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland leaders met for the first time in two years. The occasion for resurrecting what had become an almost moribund body was to discuss the ‘UK approach’ to Brexit promised by the Prime Minister. The outcome was to set up another joint committee on Brexit to be known as JMC (EN), chaired by David Davis. The devolveds have also been promised a direct line to the Brexit Secretary.  There was the usual talk about a ‘relationship built on principles of mutual understanding and consensus and co-operation.’ Some outside commentary has also called for goodwill, about structures and regular meetings. 
 
The real differences are not wished away so easily. The Scottish Government has a list of demands, based on Scotland’s vote to remain and on staying within the Single Market. Wales voted No but Welsh ministers are also concerned about market access and funding implications. Northern Ireland voted to remain and its ministers are divided but there is consensus on keeping an ‘open border’. Yet it is clear that neither Scotland nor Northern Ireland can be in the single market, while the rest of the UK is outside, without creating new internal borders within the United Kingdom. It also seems, from what UK ministers have been saying, that there is little scope for comprehensive and distinct Brexit packages for the nations and regions, nor for whole economic sectors.
 
More likely are detailed arrangements at the margins of policy, which may be both sectoral and territorial. There may be scope for variation in work permits across the UK, for the detail of fisheries management or in higher education. There will have to be a new financial settlement to deal repatriated EU expenditures. For this to work, the devolveds would need to follow the negotiations in detail rather than just laying out general principles. This implies more of an insider role than the UK Government appears to be contemplating through the new JMC mechanism. It is also a matter of political weight – pieties about cooperation and goodwill are not enough. It is still not clear how the new machinery will meet these needs.
 
Before the end of the year, the Scottish Government will publish its own priorities for Brexit. When Article 50 is published, it seems the UK Government will do the same. Only will we see how large is the gap that the new mechanisms have to bridge.
 

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Michael Keating's picture
post by Michael Keating
University of Aberdeen
2nd November 2016
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 13th June 2018

    While populist leaders and movements make headlines worldwide, an often more subtle majority nationalism remains an endemic condition of the modern world. This phenomenon is comparatively understudied. The Centre on Constitutional Change invites calls for abstracts for an international workshop on the topic of majority nationalism, to be held in February 2019.

  • 31st May 2018

    The recent report by the Growth Commission contains some interesting ideas, says Michael Keating, but also makes some problematic assumptions.

  • 30th May 2018

    The Scottish and Welsh Governments worked together closely during their negotiations with the UK Government over those aspects of the EU (Withdrawal) Bill that related to devolution. Despite ultimately choosing different paths, say Hedydd Phylip and Greg Davies, this spirit of cooperation looks set to continue.

  • 28th May 2018

    The highly-anticipated publication of 'Scotland: A New Case for Optimism' outlines the new economic case for independence but, asks Coree Brown-Swan, it remains to be seen whether this will prompt a constructive debate by Unionists and Nationalists alike about some of Scotland's economic woes.

  • 18th May 2018

    Different political actors have responded to the decision by the Scottish Parliament to withhold its consent for the UK Government’s showpiece EU (Withdrawal) Bill in very different ways. Prof Nicola McEwen sifts the facts from the hyperbole and explains where we are and where we go from here.

Read More Posts