What next for Scottish Labour?

Posted orginally on the Academy of Government blog >>

Margaret Curran, former Labour MSP, MP and Scottish Government Minister

Where were you when David Dimbleby read out the result of the exit poll? It was the biggest thrill many in Scottish Labour have had in some time. While the Tories nationally had made a mess of their campaign, the SNP seemed to lack the razor-sharp focus of before and the feeling on the doorstep for Labour activists was better than the last few years, no-one in Scottish Labour expected to gain six more seats.

After the near-death experience of the past few years, this result feels like a welcome reprieve. But is it? To answer that, we need to grapple with what actually happened during the election and respond accordingly. Misunderstand the message from the electorate, and the forward trajectory could just as easily be halted.

There was undoubtedly a shift away from the SNP on the doorsteps. At times, I did a double-take as people tooted their horns in support or broke into a smile at a Labour person knocking. Clearly the SNP campaign machine is not as invincible as we have all grown to believe.  A clear frustration with the SNP government is emerging, as people experience their public services in decline. Complacency from the First Minister is being felt; and ‘getting on with the day job’ was being repeated back to us on the doorstep. Contrary to Nicola Sturgeon’s expectations, Brexit is working against her plans, as both she and the prospect of a second referendum plunged in popularity. A significant number of the SNP’s previous supporters staying home on election day clearly helped Labour.

But perhaps the biggest shock of the campaign was the impact of Jeremy Corbyn on Scottish voters, defying the expectations of many in the Scottish Labour Party, myself included. Feedback from constituencies throughout Scotland testify that the turning point was the launch of the manifesto. Not only did it unite the party; it enabled Jeremy Corbyn to campaign on solid Labour values rather than the technocratic details of policy. He spoke over the heads of hostile reporters and, for once, Labour cut through on social media. Even those who had doubts grew to like him, attracted to his vision of a fairer and better society. He spoke to those who have seen their living standards decline year on year with no prospects of improvement and offered, to the surprise of many, the hope of a viable alternative.  This seems to be the election where age was a key factor in voting patterns.  Corbyn’s clarion call for an end to austerity and tackling inequality chimed with the recent messages of Kezia Dugdale and altogether it resonated more powerfully than ever before. Kezia performed well in the debates and the attacks from Nicola Sturgeon failed to gain traction.  Rather it was the SNP on the defensive.

But let’s not get carried away. Seven seats in Scotland is far from victory, and we underestimate the SNP at our peril. Nonetheless, we have established some groundwork for renewal. Scottish Labour now have a group of new and hungry MPs and candidates who are patently motivated more by their political values rather than the prospect of office.

There is also an energy to pursue the Scottish Government’s lacklustre record in office and reignite a debate in Scotland about public services and delivering economic prosperity for all. Corbyn delivered the break with the past that Labour desperately needed, and Kezia Dugdale’s arguments about poverty and tax may well get a much more positive hearing.

So what now? Fingers crossed the Scottish Labour Party doesn’t resort to type and engage in an internal battle between the Corbynistas as those that initially opposed him.  During the election, Corbyn knew that the broad-church nature of Labour was a strength and we need to keep it that way.

Understandably, some in Scottish Labour believe that the prospect of a second referendum is neglible at best. That is a hard argument to sustain when the nationalist party is still in government and, despite our successes last week, they still emerged as the largest party in Scotland. The SNP are hardwired to pursue the journey to independence at every opportunity and Scottish labour has to deal with that reality. It will not be off the political agenda in Scotland any time soon.

But that should not stop Scottish Labour thinking about how we improve our country and the quality of life of our citizens. At a time of increasing inequality, a struggling economy and profound challenges for our public services the SNP have run out of ideas. If we ever want to replace them in government, then we need to capture the radicalism that was articulated in the election campaign and translate into a plan of action for the Scottish Labour Party. The Scottish electorate might just be listening to us again… we now need to have something interesting to say.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Latest blogs

  • 19th February 2019

    Over the course of the UK’s preparations for withdrawing from the EU, the issue of the UK’s own internal market has emerged as an issue of concern, and one that has the potentially significant consequences for devolution. Dr Jo Hunt of Cardiff University examines the implications.

  • 12th February 2019

    CCC Fellow Professor Daniel Wincott of Cardiff University examines how Brexit processes have already reshaped territorial politics in the UK and changed its territorial constitution.

  • 7th February 2019

    The future of agriculture policy across the United Kingdom after Brexit is uncertain and risky, according to a new paper by Professor Michael Keating of the Centre on Constitutional Change. Reforms of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy over recent years have shifted the emphasis from farming to the broader concept of rural policy. As member states have gained more discretion in applying policy, the nations of the UK have also diverged, according to local conditions and preferences.

  • 4th February 2019

    In our latest report for the "Repatriation of Competences: Implications for Devolution" project, Professor Nicola McEwen and Dr Alexandra Remond examine how, in the longer term, Brexit poses significant risks for the climate and energy ambitions of the devolved nations. These include the loss of European Structural and Investment Funds targeted at climate and low carbon energy policies, from which the devolved territories have benefited disproportionately. European Investment Bank loan funding, which has financed high risk renewables projects, especially in Scotland, may also no longer be as accessible, while future access to research and innovation funding remains uncertain. The removal of the EU policy framework, which has incentivised the low carbon ambitions of the devolved nations may also result in lost opportunities.

  • 1st February 2019

    The outcome of the various Commons votes this week left certain only that the Government would either secure an amended deal and put it to a meaningful vote on Wednesday 13 February, or in the overwhelmingly likely absence of this make a further statement that day and table another amendable motion for the following day, the Groundhog Day that may lead to a ‘St Valentine’s Day Massacre’ for one side or the other. Richard Parry assesses the further two-week pause in parliamentary action on Brexit

Read More Posts