What next for Catalonia?

In the light of the Catalan results both Madrid and Barcelona have some options, says Michael Keating, but the current political climate is unlikely to see an immediate breakthrough.

The September elections in Catalonia were called in order to try and resolve the independence issue. Unable to stage a legal referendum, First Minister Artur Mas, organized a ‘plebiscitary election’ in which the pro-independence parties would seek a mandate to establish a Catalan state. The two main nationalist parties, Convergència Democrática de Catalunya (centre-right) and Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (left) presented a single list of candidates, Junts pel Si. A far-left pro-independence party Candidatura d’Unitat Popular (CUP), stood on its own. All claimed that a majority between them would constitute a mandate, although there was ambiguity about whether a majority of seats would be enough, without a majority of the popular vote. The electoral system favours the areas outside Barcelona, where nationalist support is strongest. 
In the event, the result settled nothing. Junts pel Si and CUP between them gained a majority of seats but fell slightly short of a majority of votes. It is not easy to see a way out but here are the options for the nationalists.
First, they could just declare independence unilaterally, a course to which CUP is inclined. Prominent members of the civil society pro-independence movements have long advocated this. Yet, without a majority of the popular vote, this looks democratically dubious. It is also formidably difficult as a practical matter, as it would require international recognition and the loyalty of citizens to the new state.
Second, there could be negotiations with Spain, but this depends on Madrid showing a willingness to compromise that it has not hitherto displayed.
Third there could be another Catalan election. This is possible if CUP does not support the renomination of Mas as First Minister and the parliament is deadlocked.
Fourth, the nationalists could do nothing for now and wait for the outcome of the Spanish elections in December.
On the Spanish side, one option is to suspend the statute of autonomy for Catalonia, especially if there are moves to independence. This would test the loyalty of police and civil servants in Catalonia and would be seen as a huge provocation.
Second, Madrid could open negotiations for concessions and compromise. This is not going to happen under the present Spanish government of the Partido Popular (PP), which is very rigid in its attitude and will want to take a tough line on Catalonia to win votes in December in the rest of Spain.
Third, after the Spanish elections in December, if there is a continued PP government, things will likely be much the same. Even if they lose their majority, they could form a coalition with Ciutadans/ Ciudadanos (Cs), a party founded in Catalonia to oppose nationalism, and which now has high levels of support across Spain. This would mean an even harder line. Cs actually came second in the Catalan elections, albeit well behind the winners, demonstrating a growing polarization within Catalonia. 
Fourth, if the PP and Cs between them cannot gain a majority in Spain, there is a possibility of a left-wing coalition resting on the Spanish Socialists (PSOE) and Podemos (the left-wing populist movement), with support from smaller and regional parties. This is the only scenario in which a compromise is likely. 
There are four elements for such a deal: a fiscal pact allowing Catalonia to keep more of its money; stronger protection for the Catalan language, especially in education; a recognition of Catalonia as a nation within Spain; and some sort of popular consultation on the future of Catalonia. This might not be an independence referendum but perhaps a multi-option, non-binding vote. Five years ago, such concessions might have defused the whole issue but it is possible that things have now gone beyond that. Such a deal would also have to get through the Spanish constitutional court, which is now highly politicized and unsympathetic to accommodating Spain’s internal nations.
Many people in Catalonia have been looking to Scotland for guidance. Certainly, the referendum was a means of resolving the immediate question in a democratic and agreed way, but it did not settle the issue once and for all. We are going to live with this question for a long time to come.




Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Latest blogs

  • 22nd January 2019

    The UK is increasingly polarised by Brexit identities and they seem to have become stronger than party identities, a new academic report finds. Only one in 16 people did not have a Brexit identity, while more than one in five said they had no party identity. Sir John Curtice’s latest analysis of public opinion on a further referendum finds there has been no decisive shift in favour of another referendum. The report, Brexit and public opinion 2019, by The UK in a Changing Europe, provides an authoritative, comprehensive and up-to-date guide to public opinion on each of the key issues around Brexit. CCC Fellow, Dr Coree Brown Swan contributed a chapter on "the SNP, Brexit and the politics of independence"

  • 22nd January 2019

    In the papers accompanying the draft Environment (Principles and Governance) Bill published at the end of 2018, the UK Government says that it is “exploring opportunities to co-design the final proposals with the devolved administrations.” There are clear benefits in having strong co-operation and collaboration across the UK in the oversight of our environmental law and performance. Yet the challenge of finding a way forward in terms of working together is substantial since each part of the UK is in a different position at present. Given where things stand today, it may be better to accept that a good resolution is not possible immediately and to revisit the issue at a later stage - so long as there is a strong commitment to return and not allow interim arrangements to become fixed. Colin Reid, Professor of Environmental Law at the University of Dundee examines the issues.

  • 17th January 2019

    Richard Parry assesses a memorable day in UK parliamentary history as the Commons splits 432-202 on 15 January 2019 against the Government's recommended Brexit route. It was the most dramatic night at Westminster since the Labour government’s defeat on a confidence motion in 1979.

  • 17th January 2019

    What is the Irish government’s Brexit wish-list? The suggestion that Irish unity, as opposed to safeguarding political and economic stability, is the foremost concern of the Irish government is to misunderstand and misrepresent the motivations of this key Brexit stakeholder, writes Mary C. Murphy (University College Cork).

  • 17th January 2019

    Brexit is in trouble but not because of the Irish backstop, argues the CCC's Michael Keating.

Read More Posts