Scottish Independence and the Imaginings of Welfare Futures – and Welfare Pasts!

Gerry Mooney of The Open University, discusses how social welfare is playing a key role in the imaginings and visions of what an Independent Scotland would be like.

The debate around Scotland’s constitutional status and future has rarely been in isolation from controversies and arguments around the shape and future trajectory of social welfare – both in a Scottish but also a UK wide context. Broadly defined and understood, arguably social welfare issues were part of the demand for devolution in the 1970s, at the time expressed in relation to concerns over rising unemployment and stagnating wages in Scotland. With the establishment of devolution in 1999, the reconvened Scottish Parliament was largely a social policy-making institution, the key policy areas over which it had jurisdiction being in social welfare including health, education, housing and social services. And when we reflect on the Independence Referendum of 2014 and the longer debate around Scottish Independence, we can see only too well that social welfare has been entangled with demands for ‘more devolution’ or for full Independence.

However, questions of social welfare do not play a role simply in relation to the furore over which additional powers could or should be devolved. Perhaps more significantly, social welfare is playing a key role in the imaginings and visions of what an Independent Scotland would be like. Of course such visions are themselves hotly contested but once again we do not have far to look to find the mobilisation of social welfare in these future imaginings.

In no small part these revolve around claims as to what a Scottish nation state, or just state, would ‘look like’. If the idea of Independence can be a somewhat abstract notion, then arguably the notion of a Scottish state is even more so. It is of course not new to see questions of the state reduced to arguments about state provision of services and the various institutions that form the architecture of that state. Within this context questions of social welfare come to play a particularly significant role: in the Independence debate social welfare was mobilised by the YES camp as a way of both differentiating what is happening in Scotland that is different – not least in relation to health and education – if not benefits which remain overwhelmingly under the control of the UK Government in Westminster  - and to envision what a future Scottish society, an Independent Scottish society could potentially ‘look like’! This would be, it is argued, a uniquely ‘Scottish’ welfare system founded on principles of social justice, egalitarianism and fairness, in sharp contrast with the popular punitivism of Westminster. In this respect such a system would reflect not only long held ‘distinctively Scottish’ values, attitudes and aspirations but would also signal that an Independent Scotland would be a society driven by a good and benign Scottish state to meet social justice goals. While there is much to question and criticise in such claims, not least the long-held myths of a uniquely Scottish set of values and attitudes, their political potency should not be underestimated.

Such myths, and the ways in which they are invoked in a wide range of popular stories that we tell ourselves about Scottish society, play to wider narratives of Scotland as a national community. They are a crucial part of a national political project to remake Scottish society in a particular way that marries together a vision of economic competitiveness linked with universal benefits. Imagining the future Scotland comes therefore to be represented and understood as being built upon statist and welfarist ideas of the good (Scottish) society. But, and here I am reminded of Tom Nairn’s argument about the ‘Janus face of nationalism’ - simultaneously looking backwards and forwards in ‘a nationalist double time’ – the vision of a welfarist future is also a nostalgic vision of a welfare past; a pre-1979, pre-Thatcherite golden era in which the ‘classic’ UK welfare state was built on fairness, universalism and social democracy. The romanticisation of a welfare system that never was transcends both sides in the Scottish Independence debate, but it also seriously limits the vision of the kind of society Scotland could become.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Gerry Mooney's picture
post by Gerry Mooney
The Open University
25th March 2015

Latest blogs

  • 18th December 2018

    Aileen McHarg looks at last week’s decision by the Supreme Court in the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill reference which demonstrates both the strength and the weakness of Holyrood as a legislature.

  • 17th December 2018

    The Supreme Court's ruling on the Scottish Continuity Bill gave both sides something but acknowledged that the vast bulk of the Bill was within Holyrood's competence at the time it was passed however, suggests Sionaidh Douglas-Scott, the strong feeling that devolved interests are not taken seriously highlights underlying fractures within the Union.

  • 14th December 2018

    Disagreements about the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland are about more than practical considerations of where customs checks should be performed, says Michael Keating.

  • 14th December 2018

    Derek MacKay’s third budget of this parliamentary session was doomed to be overshadowed by events at Westminster.

  • 12th December 2018

    Although the N-VA has insisted it left the Belgian government to pursue ’principled opposition’ those principle are, says Coree Brown Swan, at the very least informed by a strategy that allows it to maintain policy influence from outside government while countering the electoral threat posed by a resurgent Vlaams Belang.

Read More Posts