Prof Jeffery Receives Award for 'Impact'

Professor Charlie Jeffery, Fellow of the Centre on Constitutional Change and Senior Vice-Principal of the University of Edinburgh, has received a major award recognising his contribution to public engagement with research. The award focusses on his work using research to transform the public and political understanding of social issues – colloquially known as ‘impact’. 
The Economic and Social Research Council’s (ESRC) Impact Champion Award is an acknowledgement of Charlie’s contribution to innovative and enduring methods of working with both policymakers and the wider public. The award recognises his contribution throughout his career but the judges particularly highlighted his contribution to the debates surrounding devolution within the UK over the last decade. 
On receiving his award, Prof Jeffery said, “The ESRC has been a constant feature in my life as an academic and receiving an accolade like this about the impact of both my work and that of my colleagues is just tremendous.”
As Director of the Devolution and Constitutional Change (DCC) and the Future of the UK and Scotland (FUS) programmes, Charlie placed informing public debate at the heart of the research agenda. In addition, Professor Jeffery advised the Commission on Scottish Devolution (2008-9), the Scotland Bill Committee of the Scottish Parliament (2011- 12) and served as a member of the McKay Commission on the West Lothian Question (2012-14). 
The panel gave particular praise for Charlie’s support for other academics, encouraging and supporting researchers at all stages in their careers in reaching out to the wider world. One frequent collaborator, Prof Richard Wyn-Jones of the University of Cardiff, explained, “It is no exaggeration to say that Charlie Jeffery has played an utterly transformative role – transforming both opportunities and attitudes towards impact – among a whole cadre of academics across the UK, myself among their number.”

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to

Latest blogs

  • 18th May 2018

    Different political actors have responded to the decision by the Scottish Parliament to withhold its consent for the UK Government’s showpiece EU (Withdrawal) Bill in very different ways. Prof Nicola McEwen sifts the facts from the hyperbole and explains where we are and where we go from here.

  • 15th May 2018

    On 8 May the UK’s House of Lords passed an amendment to require the House of Commons to vote on remaining in the European Economic Area (EEA), the possibility of Britain adopting the so-called ‘Norway model’ is back on the agenda of British politics. Here the authors of Squaring the Circle on Brexit: Could the Norway Model Work?, John Erik Fossum and Hans Petter Graver, give some background to Norway’s relationship with the European Union and reveal the truth behind some common myths about the Norway model.

  • 4th May 2018

    The Sewel Convention has historically worked well, says Michael Keating, but Brexit will put it to the test.

  • 3rd May 2018

    Amendments to controversial Clause 11 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill were agreed in the House of Lords yesterday evening, following a deal between the UK and Welsh governments last week. Jack Sheldon and Mike Kenny explain the significance of this agreement for the UK as a whole and outline a number of unresolved issues it raises.

  • 2nd May 2018

    The hesitant progress of Brexit legislation through Westminster has provided parliament with an opportunity to show its teeth and, says Tobias Lock, it demonstrates that the legislature has bite as well as bark.

Read More Posts