Navigating the currency debate

The UK government's publicly declared  stance ruling out a currency union with any independent Scotland has been in the spotlight in recent days, and called into question. This follows the Guardian reporting an unnamed government minister as saying; 'Of course there would be a currency union,' noting 'There would be a highly complex set of negotiations after a yes vote, with many moving pieces. The UK wants to keep Trident nuclear weapons at Faslane and the Scottish government wants a currency union – you can see the outlines of a deal
 
George Osborne and Danny Alexander have denied these remarks, saying that 'There will not be a currency union in the event of independence. The only way to keep the UK pound is to stay in the UK. Walking out of the UK means walking out of the UK pound. A currency union will not work because it would not be in Scotland's interests and would not be in the UK's interests.
 
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon challenged the statement 'Now that the card has been withdrawn, it gives an even bigger boost to the yes campaign. And it can only add to the sense of crisis which is engulfing the no campaign'. 
 
While the debate continues in the political space, our analysts have provided research about the prospects and practicality of a currency union. View our series of currency reflections, published in response to the Chancellor's February statements on currency and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research Report on Scotland's Currency Options,
 
Programme fellow Michael Keating also weighed in on the issue in The Conversation, arguing that the SNP's stance on currency is a difficult one, 'It’s really not convincing for the Scottish Government to say rUK [the remaining UK] will give way and share the currency with us anyway. It leaves them in a weak position in negotiation if they do not have a fall-back''

 

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

University of Edinburgh
3rd April 2014
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 25th April 2018

    Mary C. Murphy offers a detailed and in-depth analysis of Northern Ireland’s relationship with the EU, the role the EU has played in rebuilding the region after the Troubles, and the challenges and opportunities that Brexit might offer Northern Ireland in terms of its fragile politics and economy.

  • 25th April 2018

    The path being pursued by the DUP in Brexit, says Jonathan Evershed, is not so far from the mainstream of Unionist opinion.

  • 24th April 2018

    Antonia Ruiz, CCC visitor, looks at the rise of the populist radical right in Europe. She stresses that it's a topic that worries citizens, journalists, political elites and scholars alike.

  • 24th April 2018

    The promise of ‘change’ was key for the Austrian Christian democrats’ landslide victory in last year’s general elections. Recent sub-state elections, however, have perpetuated the influence of incumbent governors – and their power to veto reforms of Austria’s federal system. In light of current electoral dynamics, Patrick Utz analyses the (limited) potential for federal reforms in Austria.

  • 17th April 2018

    Richard Parry discusses the interacting policies on devolution and Brexit in the current impasse between UK and devolved governments.

Read More Posts