Fairer Caring Nations

Achieving economic growth, social justice and tackling inequality: Kirstein Rummery and her team have been researching what Scotland can learn about childcare and long-term care and its effect on gender equality from international evidence?
The Fairer Caring Nations project has been looking at countries with good gender equality – where women have improved access to political power, resources, income, leisure and control over their lives – to see what Scotland could learn. It has been focussing specifically on the role that childcare and long-term social care can play in achieving gender equality.
The project team invited international experts from six different countries who score well on those indices of gender equality to discuss how childcare and long-term care policies work in their countries. They were quizzed by people working in Scottish Government, local authorities, the Department of Health and academics about which policies worked most effectively, and which ones could work in Scotland.
Three different models were discussed:
The Nordic/social democratic model (for example in Sweden, Iceland and Denmark) which is characterised by near-universal state-provided or funded services, generous parental leave (including leave for fathers) and relatively low support for family carers; 
The market/family model (for example in the Netherlands and Germany), where the community and family play a significant part in providing services and support alongside state and private providers, with the state commissioning services or running insurance schemes to cover their costs;
And the devolved/federal model (the province of Quebec in Canada), where a devolved administration has developed a universal-coverage childcare policy using devolved legislative and social policy powers that has improved educational outcomes, helped to tackle poverty and income inequality, and improved gender inequality better than the rest of Canada.
Of course, you cannot simply import policies from abroad: the political and social context in Scotland is different from the case study countries in many ways: but the challenge of achieving better outcomes for children, parents (particularly women) and disabled and older people are universal. The international evidence is clear: investing in reducing gender equality improves economic growth, helps to address educational and income inequalities, improves outcomes for children, enables disabled people, carers and older people to live more independently, (e.g. to work and contribute to their communities), and improves social justice and wellbeing. The team learned interesting things about the advantages and drawbacks of each model, what works and what doesn’t, and will be presenting their findings from September onwards in the following ways:
Policy briefings on models of childcare and long-term care that address social inequality, and how they could be implemented in Scotland;
A free conference with workshop sessions on childcare, gender equality, long-term-social care and preventative social policy internationally, and what Scotland could learn in September;
An accessible book presenting the research evidence, particularly the advantages and drawbacks of each model and how the policies could be applied in Scotland; and
Presentations to different organisations about the policy and practice implications of our findings.
If you would like to receive an invitation to the conference, details of how to buy the book, or would like the research team to visit your organisation and present their findings in a workshop, please contact the Centre on Constitutional Change using the details below: we look forward to hearing from you and to helping Scotland develop fair and progressive childcare and long-term care policies that help improve wellbeing, economic growth, and social justice.
Media and general enquiries about the project should be addressed to Nick.Bibby@ed.ac.uk, or you can contact Professor Kirstein Rummery directly at Kirstein.Rummery@stir.ac.uk.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Kirstein Rummery's picture
University of Stirling
18th June 2015
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 13th June 2018

    While populist leaders and movements make headlines worldwide, an often more subtle majority nationalism remains an endemic condition of the modern world. This phenomenon is comparatively understudied. The Centre on Constitutional Change invites calls for abstracts for an international workshop on the topic of majority nationalism, to be held in February 2019.

  • 31st May 2018

    The recent report by the Growth Commission contains some interesting ideas, says Michael Keating, but also makes some problematic assumptions.

  • 30th May 2018

    The Scottish and Welsh Governments worked together closely during their negotiations with the UK Government over those aspects of the EU (Withdrawal) Bill that related to devolution. Despite ultimately choosing different paths, say Hedydd Phylip and Greg Davies, this spirit of cooperation looks set to continue.

  • 28th May 2018

    The highly-anticipated publication of 'Scotland: A New Case for Optimism' outlines the new economic case for independence but, asks Coree Brown-Swan, it remains to be seen whether this will prompt a constructive debate by Unionists and Nationalists alike about some of Scotland's economic woes.

  • 18th May 2018

    Different political actors have responded to the decision by the Scottish Parliament to withhold its consent for the UK Government’s showpiece EU (Withdrawal) Bill in very different ways. Prof Nicola McEwen sifts the facts from the hyperbole and explains where we are and where we go from here.

Read More Posts