Fairer Caring Nations

Achieving economic growth, social justice and tackling inequality: Kirstein Rummery and her team have been researching what Scotland can learn about childcare and long-term care and its effect on gender equality from international evidence?
 
The Fairer Caring Nations project has been looking at countries with good gender equality – where women have improved access to political power, resources, income, leisure and control over their lives – to see what Scotland could learn. It has been focussing specifically on the role that childcare and long-term social care can play in achieving gender equality.
 
The project team invited international experts from six different countries who score well on those indices of gender equality to discuss how childcare and long-term care policies work in their countries. They were quizzed by people working in Scottish Government, local authorities, the Department of Health and academics about which policies worked most effectively, and which ones could work in Scotland.
 
Three different models were discussed:
 
The Nordic/social democratic model (for example in Sweden, Iceland and Denmark) which is characterised by near-universal state-provided or funded services, generous parental leave (including leave for fathers) and relatively low support for family carers; 
The market/family model (for example in the Netherlands and Germany), where the community and family play a significant part in providing services and support alongside state and private providers, with the state commissioning services or running insurance schemes to cover their costs;
And the devolved/federal model (the province of Quebec in Canada), where a devolved administration has developed a universal-coverage childcare policy using devolved legislative and social policy powers that has improved educational outcomes, helped to tackle poverty and income inequality, and improved gender inequality better than the rest of Canada.
 
Of course, you cannot simply import policies from abroad: the political and social context in Scotland is different from the case study countries in many ways: but the challenge of achieving better outcomes for children, parents (particularly women) and disabled and older people are universal. The international evidence is clear: investing in reducing gender equality improves economic growth, helps to address educational and income inequalities, improves outcomes for children, enables disabled people, carers and older people to live more independently, (e.g. to work and contribute to their communities), and improves social justice and wellbeing. The team learned interesting things about the advantages and drawbacks of each model, what works and what doesn’t, and will be presenting their findings from September onwards in the following ways:
 
Policy briefings on models of childcare and long-term care that address social inequality, and how they could be implemented in Scotland;
A free conference with workshop sessions on childcare, gender equality, long-term-social care and preventative social policy internationally, and what Scotland could learn in September;
An accessible book presenting the research evidence, particularly the advantages and drawbacks of each model and how the policies could be applied in Scotland; and
Presentations to different organisations about the policy and practice implications of our findings.
 
If you would like to receive an invitation to the conference, details of how to buy the book, or would like the research team to visit your organisation and present their findings in a workshop, please contact the Centre on Constitutional Change using the details below: we look forward to hearing from you and to helping Scotland develop fair and progressive childcare and long-term care policies that help improve wellbeing, economic growth, and social justice.
 
Media and general enquiries about the project should be addressed to Nick.Bibby@ed.ac.uk, or you can contact Professor Kirstein Rummery directly at Kirstein.Rummery@stir.ac.uk.
 

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Kirstein Rummery's picture
University of Stirling
18th June 2015
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 22nd January 2019

    The UK is increasingly polarised by Brexit identities and they seem to have become stronger than party identities, a new academic report finds. Only one in 16 people did not have a Brexit identity, while more than one in five said they had no party identity. Sir John Curtice’s latest analysis of public opinion on a further referendum finds there has been no decisive shift in favour of another referendum. The report, Brexit and public opinion 2019, by The UK in a Changing Europe, provides an authoritative, comprehensive and up-to-date guide to public opinion on each of the key issues around Brexit. CCC Fellow, Dr Coree Brown Swan contributed a chapter on "the SNP, Brexit and the politics of independence"

  • 22nd January 2019

    In the papers accompanying the draft Environment (Principles and Governance) Bill published at the end of 2018, the UK Government says that it is “exploring opportunities to co-design the final proposals with the devolved administrations.” There are clear benefits in having strong co-operation and collaboration across the UK in the oversight of our environmental law and performance. Yet the challenge of finding a way forward in terms of working together is substantial since each part of the UK is in a different position at present. Given where things stand today, it may be better to accept that a good resolution is not possible immediately and to revisit the issue at a later stage - so long as there is a strong commitment to return and not allow interim arrangements to become fixed. Colin Reid, Professor of Environmental Law at the University of Dundee examines the issues.

  • 17th January 2019

    Richard Parry assesses a memorable day in UK parliamentary history as the Commons splits 432-202 on 15 January 2019 against the Government's recommended Brexit route. It was the most dramatic night at Westminster since the Labour government’s defeat on a confidence motion in 1979.

  • 17th January 2019

    What is the Irish government’s Brexit wish-list? The suggestion that Irish unity, as opposed to safeguarding political and economic stability, is the foremost concern of the Irish government is to misunderstand and misrepresent the motivations of this key Brexit stakeholder, writes Mary C. Murphy (University College Cork).

  • 17th January 2019

    Brexit is in trouble but not because of the Irish backstop, argues the CCC's Michael Keating.

Read More Posts