Brexit Reflections - Women in Charge: How Close Is a Female-Led Parliament?

Meryl Kenny suggests that women in the top jobs would send a powerful message about who is fit to lead—and not just in times of crisis.

A week is a long time in politics. Britain’s vote to leave the European Union (EU) has been, above all, a failure of political leadership—one that has left the country effectively without a government or opposition, at a time when fundamental decisions need to be made about the U.K.’s place in the world.

Once the dust has settled, the face of Westminster politics may look very different. As things stand, by the autumn, there could be both a female prime minister and female leader of the opposition in the House of Commons, a historic achievement. The Conservative Party leadership contest looks like a two-horse race between Home Secretary Theresa May, and Justice Secretary Michael Gove (with Stephen Crabb, Andrea Leadsom and Liam Fox also in the running).

On the Labour side, a leadership contest is inevitable, with former Shadow First Secretary of State Angela Eagle expected to challenge party leader Jeremy Corbyn. Beyond Westminster, the first minister of Northern Ireland, Arlene Foster, is female, as is the Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon, who has attracted praise for her quick and decisive leadership in the aftermath of Brexit.

Is this a potential turning point for women in British politics?

While some cracks have been made in the political glass ceiling—most notably in Scotland, where the three largest parties in the Scottish parliament are all led by women—women party leaders have been few and far between at Westminster. This reflects wider comparative trends, where the general rule has been ‘the higher, the fewer’—in other words, the more powerful the position, the less likely it is to be filled by a woman. Having women in the top jobs at Westminster, then, would send a powerful symbolic message about who is fit to lead and may also encourage more women to stand for office.

Yet, research on women leaders around the world also points to more troubling trends—women often only get a chance to lead in times of crisis, usually when parties are out of power or losing favor with voters. In other words, women are usually left to clean up the mess—they are more likely to come to power when the jobs at the top are undesirable. Women leaders thus often find themselves on the edge of a ‘glass cliff’—they are more likely to be elected to leadership posts when there is a high chance of failure. They are also more likely than men to be thrown out—and thrown out more quickly—if the party continues to lose seats. Even if elected, May’s and Eagle’s tenure might potentially be short-lived, given they both face significant challenges in governing and/or winning elections.

Simply having women at the top is not enough—it also matters who they are, what ideas they have and what they (and their governments) do once they are in office. This is particularly crucial in the aftermath of Brexit, given the EU’s important role as a gender equality actor (particularly in protecting women’s employment rights). The equal treatment of men and women has been a fundamental tenet of the EU since its inception, and all EU policies are designed and implemented through a gender lens (known as gender mainstreaming).  Yet, women’s voices and issues of gender equality were largely ignored in the run-up to the EU referendum. Indeed, in a campaign dominated by white Conservative party men, women politicians and campaigners featured in only 17.5% of print and broadcast media coverage. There has also been little substantive discussion of the consequences of Brexit for women and for gender equality.

Whatever the face of the new leadership, then, it is vitally important that women are at the table as the UK negotiates its exit from Europe, as well as its own constitutional settlement. Hard times are ahead—continuing austerity, which has had a disproportionately detrimental impact on women, and the possibility of an economic recession; the potential scrapping of EU frameworks (including legal protections for women); the loss of the recourse provided by the European Court of Justice and other enforcement mechanisms. Leadership and vigilance are needed in order to keep women and equality issues on the agenda, as otherwise gendered inequalities are likely to widen.

Meryl Kenny is lecturer in Gender and Politics at the University of Edinburgh.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to

Meryl Kenny's picture
Guest post by Meryl Kenny
University of Edinburgh
4th July 2016
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 10th August 2018

    Brexit is re-making the UK’s constitution under our noses. The territorial constitution is particularly fragile. Pursuing Brexit, Theresa May’s government has stumbled into deep questions about devolution.

  • 8th August 2018

    The UK in a Changing Europe has formed a new Brexit Policy Panel (BPP). The BPP is a cross-disciplinary group of over 100 leading social scientists created to provide ongoing analysis of where we have got to in the Brexit process, and to forecast where we are headed. Members of the UK in a Changing Europe Brexit Policy Panel complete a monthly survey addressing three key areas of uncertainty around Brexit: if —and when—the UK will leave the EU; how Brexit will affect British politics; and what our relationship with the EU is likely to look like in the future. The CCC participates on the Panel.

  • 2nd August 2018

    The House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee issued its report ‘Devolution and Exiting the EU: reconciling differences and building strong relationships’. Discussing its contents, Professor Nicola McEwen suggests that the report includes some practical recommendations, some of which were informed by CCC research. It also shines a light on some of the more difficult challenges ahead.

  • 31st July 2018

    The politicisation of Brexit, combined with deteriorating relations between London and Dublin, has created a toxic atmosphere in Northern Ireland, says Mary Murphy, which will require imagination and possibly new institutions to resolve.

  • 25th July 2018

    Given that there are many policy differences between Northern Ireland and other parts of the UK, asks Jonathan Evershed, why has customs policy been singled out as a red line by Unionists?

Read More Posts