Brexit Reflections - Europe’s West Lothian Question

As the politicians try to make sense of the referendum result, they are struggling to define what ‘leave’ actually means.

There are two issues at stake here: access to the European market; and membership of the political union.  Many on the Leave side are suggesting that the UK will retain access to the single market in one way or another and that there may not even be much reduction in the free movement of labour or migration more generally. That is to be decided. What is surely clear, however, is that the UK will no longer belong to the political institutions of the EU including the Council of the European Union in which the laws are made. So the price of entry into the single market could be accepting the rules of the market even if we have no vote in making them.

Scotland is also grappling with the result. In 2014 it voted decisively to remain in the British economic and political union. Now it has voted by an even larger margin to remain in the European Union. It cannot now remain in both political unions and so faces a difficult choice. It seems likely that Scots will be asked again to vote for independence in order to remain in the EU. The downside of this is that there will be a hard EU border between Scotland and England. If the UK (or England and Wales) do negotiate access to the European single market, however, that would remove this danger, allow Scotland access to both markets and make independence easier. Indeed such an independent Scotland would have a vote in the Council of the European Union while England and Wales would not. In a new iteration of the West Lothian Question Scotland could end up with a say in making policy for England and Wales while the English and Welsh had to take what they are offered – the West Brussels Question?

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

post by Michael Keating
University of Aberdeen
27th June 2016
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 25th April 2018

    Mary C. Murphy offers a detailed and in-depth analysis of Northern Ireland’s relationship with the EU, the role the EU has played in rebuilding the region after the Troubles, and the challenges and opportunities that Brexit might offer Northern Ireland in terms of its fragile politics and economy.

  • 25th April 2018

    The path being pursued by the DUP in Brexit, says Jonathan Evershed, is not so far from the mainstream of Unionist opinion.

  • 24th April 2018

    Antonia Ruiz, CCC visitor, looks at the rise of the populist radical right in Europe. She stresses that it's a topic that worries citizens, journalists, political elites and scholars alike.

  • 24th April 2018

    The promise of ‘change’ was key for the Austrian Christian democrats’ landslide victory in last year’s general elections. Recent sub-state elections, however, have perpetuated the influence of incumbent governors – and their power to veto reforms of Austria’s federal system. In light of current electoral dynamics, Patrick Utz analyses the (limited) potential for federal reforms in Austria.

  • 17th April 2018

    Richard Parry discusses the interacting policies on devolution and Brexit in the current impasse between UK and devolved governments.

Read More Posts