Be Careful What You Wish For

Recall the reaction of Brenda from Bristol on 18th April when the British General Election was announced: ‘You’re joking! Not another one! Oh, for God’s sake. Honestly, I can’t stand this…’. Brenda had experienced: the 2015 General Election, 2016 Brexit referendum, the 2017 English council elections, and was about to undergo the 2017 General Election. Imagine the reaction of a mythical Helen from Huntly, who had undergone: the 2014 Independence referendum, the 2015 BGE, the 2016 Scottish parliament election, the Brexit vote also in 2016, the council elections in 2017, and then the British General Election (BGE) in 2017. That’s six, to Brenda’s four; all in the space of three years. Perhaps we can understand the scunner factor, especially as Nicola Sturgeon announced her intention on 13th March to have a second ScIndyRef in the next few years.

One month later, Theresa May announced the British General Election. Sturgeon appeared to have done all the right, and obvious, things since the Brexit vote: maintaining contact with May, trying to close off any suggestion that she was jumping the referendum gun (‘now is not the time’), only to be confronted by force majeure.  Having made her bed, she had to lie in it, giving the Scottish Conservatives in particular the issue they craved: ‘saving the Union’. So they fought the local council elections in May 2017 on the constitutional question, not on local service provision, the ‘day job’ of local councillors.

If we had paid particular attention to the local election results a month before, we might have read the runes. If we exclude the vote for ‘Independent’ councillors (10%), and focused on the first preference vote shares of the four main parties, compared this with vote share in BGE 2017, we would have found the following:

Remarkably close, but in the event, not much remarked upon.

The 2017 General Election will possibly be remembered for two ‘mistakes’: May’s search for a mandate to negotiate Brexit based on a landslide victory; and Sturgeon’s manoeuvre to lay a second IndyRef on the table once the outcome of Brexit was sufficiently clear. It is, of course, easy to be wise after the event, and to treat as ‘obvious’ what is anything but, given hindsight being the wonderful thing it is meant to be.

So what does BGE 2017 mean for Scottish politics? The return of multi-party politics – which were there despite the crudities of first-past-the-post. The old saw about the versatility of ‘one club’ politics were there to behold. Second, the revival of the Tories in Scotland, virtually doubling their share of the vote in two years. Third, Labour’s hanging-on-in-there, up almost three percentage points on 2015.

With results come challenges: put simply, what do parties do for an encore? The SNP has to govern without the prospect of ScIndyRef2, and a Scottish Parliament Election in 2020 to boot, which presents challenges enough. The Tories have to face the possibility of their referendum fox being shot, which means they have to get on with their day jobs, at both local and national levels. Labour, whose vote in Scotland was 13 points below the UK party share, has to rediscover its mojo, to work out what it is actually for, and where it stands on the Scottish question. Lib-Dems remain firmly in their niche. Over all of this hangs the vulnerability of the current UK Conservative government, faced with negotiating Brexit. The message? Be careful what you wish for next time around.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to

post by David McCrone
University of Edinburgh
12th June 2017

Latest blogs

  • 22nd March 2018

    The devolved legislatures’ ‘continuity’ legislation prepares their statute books for Brexit in the event of an ongoing impasse with the UK Government over the so-called ‘power grab’ in the EU Withdrawal Bill. Professor Nicola McEwen suggests these ongoing discussions and debates provide insight into the challenges and opportunities likely to shape ongoing intergovernmental relationships.

  • 22nd March 2018

    Two decades have passed since there was last a serious consideration of how the UK uses referendums. In the light of the Referendums of recent years, our colleagues at the Constitution Unit at UCL established the Independent Commission on Referendums. Ahead of a public event in Edinburgh, the Commission's research director, Dr Alan Renwick, explains its terms of reference.

  • 9th March 2018

    Stephen Hornsby, a partner at Goodman Derrick LLP, comments on Michael Keating's recent paper on the policy making implications of Brexit for agriculture in the UK.

  • 9th March 2018

    In response to the apparent surge in support for Corsican nationalists, President Macron has made it clear that Corsica will not be allowed to distinguish itself further from the rest of France. However, says Dr Alexendra Remond, support for autonomy may be symptomatic more of disenchantment with the status quo than of growing Corsican nationalism.

  • 2nd March 2018

    With little enough fanfare, Cabinet Office Minister David Liddington MP set out how Britain will operate post-Brexit. Prof Michael Kenny and Jack Sheldon consider what he had to say.

Read More Posts